The future is tomorrow appears to be the thesis at
WaPo today as she deconstructs the hype behind Blake Lemoine's maverick suggestion that
Google's
LaMDA is sentient. Yet artificial intelligence as-we-know-it is everywhere and becoming normalized with assistants like Siri, Alexa, et al, leading Parmy Olson down an electronic rabbit hole verging on
sensawunda. While
Google's artificial intelligence is impressive, Zeeshan Aleem wants to know
Did Google Create A Sentient Program? Well, he spoke with the Santa Fe Institute's Melanie Mitchell to discover how Lemoine was potentially duped by LaMDA while undermining the entire idea of LaMDA being conscious. Just so very weird no one is coming out of the woodwork to advocate for Lemoine and LaMDA, but when
Google's market cap is $1.416 trillion, that's a helluva lot of hush money. Despite all this pomp, circumstance, and hype, Stephen Marche feels the need to let everyone know
Artificial Consciousness Is Boring. Despite the lede, what Steve describes about
Google's language model
PaLM certainly is wondrous and provocative. Especially by writing
In a strange way, a program like PaLM would be easier to comprehend if it simply were sentient.. From there, AI doesn't seem so boring after all. (CS)
-- Delivered by Feed43 service
from THE ANOMALIST https://wapo.st/3xFXCV1
No comments:
Post a Comment
Let us know what you think