Complete Transcript of Congress's Historic Hearing on Unidentified Aerial Phenomena - The Debrief

Tim McMillan does a service even for those who've seen/heard the May 17th House UAP hearing. The @rev rendition Congress Holds Historic Open Hearing on UFOs 5/17/22 Transcript provides timing cues but lacks some of Tim's entries, at least at the beginning. Harvard's Avi Loeb has some Reflections on the First Congressional Hearing on Unidentified Aerial Objects in Half a Century. Unsurprisingly, Loeb makes the case for his complementary Galileo Project effort to get at UAPs in a different way than the Pentagon's program. In saying we must "not rely [italics mine] on inferior quality data from past decades," he's also setting up an argument that never really existed. Bryce Zabel rather neatly turns the discussion about UAP phenomena around in pondering What Do They Know about Us? Not only is it an awful lot, but "their" knowing our current fascination with the subject might have ominous consequences, thinks Bryce. Some relief should come from Top UFO Patents Since Roswell: Tech Talk. Christopher Plain clearly praises Stefan Gerhart and Sir Josh Rutledge's included half-hour discussion, noting it offers a possible inventor identification behind its six "Abandoned" patent applications. (WM)

_{-- Delivered by Feed43 service}

from THE ANOMALIST https://bit.ly/3z9bxW4