Trinity: The Best Kept Secret- A Critique - A Different Perspective

If not for the current excitement in the field, Jacques Vallee and Paola Harris' book about a pre-Roswell ufo crash might be leading ufological discussion today. What there is about Trinity: The Best Kept Secret is predominantly negative. Kevin Randle's analysis argues the 1945 San Antonio, New Mexico, crash case is largely the result of confabulation with the 1947 Roswell and 1964 Socorro events, whatever its factual basis. Vallee and Harris discuss how the book came to be and give their views on some of the points that bother Kevin in Kevin's interview Jacques Vallee and Paola Harris - Trinity: The Best Kept Secret. Rich Reynolds confesses to be "a Vallee admirer," which gives his review, The Vallee/Harris Vast Wasteland: Trinity: The Best Kept Secret, more punch. Rich lists a few more acceptable points of the book, while mostly deriding factual, logical, and stylistic flaws. In "...They Know Not What They Do": What to Make of Trinity: The Best-Kept Secret Bryan Sentes challenges the book from scientific, scholarly, and journalistic angles, particularly emphasizing the last. Bryan reinforces a "folkloric" component he earlier espied in the 1945 story, and he contends the scientist in Vallee forbids him from grasping the full "'symbolic' dimension" the crash--real or imaginary--does possess. Bryan's A Note on Twin Peaks Season 3 and Trinity: The Best-Kept Secret provides a short postscript. And Jose Antonio Caravaca in Are the Crashed UFOs a "Communication" Method of an Unknown Intelligence?: Jacques Vallee Defends It in His Latest Book explicates what he believes Vallee may be getting at. (WM)

_{-- Delivered by Feed43 service}

from THE ANOMALIST https://bit.ly/3ip5Bjl