UFO cases even such as the Nimitz may come and go, or go and come back again--and again--but certain controversies within the field never seem to die. John Tenney suggests some of these debates might not vanish even were ET contact unequivocally proven. One of these Great Issues of ufology is whether just one explanation, traditionally ET, largely suffices "for the remnant of reports that remain unexplained after careful analysis." John Rimmer supplies that last quote and reviews one such all-encompassing effort in
Crossed Wires. Jan H. Landsberg's
UFOs Unmasked comes across plausibly as a voluminous, earnest, but ultimately unsuccessful alternative unitary effort. While Landsberg is most certainly correct that ET isn't the sole explanation for all unsolved cases, that should not eliminate the possibility that
some reports could possibly be of visitors from interstellar zip codes. Rich Reynolds understands the quandary and suggests a "mundane" contributing possibility in
The Source(s) for Some UFO Sightings. Commenter Bryan Sentes notes that Rich's "drone" explanation may not fly well for the 14-year-old Nimitz encounters with, apparently, numbers of objects whose acceleration, velocity, and power characteristics so far exceed capabilities foreseeable of drones. Such seeming violations of physics by humans could indeed be grist for "secret space force" thinking of the kind that would make most ETH proponents and anti-ETH skeptics alike blanche. (WM)
-- Delivered by Feed43 service
from THE ANOMALIST http://bit.ly/2J1e3EF
No comments:
Post a Comment
Let us know what you think