Even considering the "new respectability" accorded UFOs, it's worth wondering whether results will be different from the Condon Report of 1969 and the 1990's GAO effort to investigate how Roswell records were handled. Billy Cox taps CUFOS Scientific Director Mark Rodeghier for his views and ponders how effective Congress may be in getting better UFO/UAP information—much less resolution—published. One might take heart in Jason Colavito's sour
Congress Poised to Require Investigation of Ufology's Crash Retrieval Conspiracy, though remembering Dr. Rodeghier's opinions in Billy Cox' article. Something else came out of the May 17th house hearing that might raise concerns within the UFO community, and that's covered in Leonard David's question about
Faking a UFO/UAP Sighting: Should There be a Law? Mark Rodeghier notes civilian UFO image/encounter fakery doesn't much relate to the proposed government effort, which focuses on military/other governmental reports. On the larger issue, those consulted all agreed any UFO hoaxing is not to be countenanced, but Avi Loeb's view about reproducibility of scientific results seems hard to apply to UAP studies. Questions of tomfoolery shouldn't arise when
NASA Wants to Turn Satellites into Alien Hunters. Sarah Knapton reveals NASA's considering something the European Space Agency's Philippe Ailleris has been suggesting for years. (WM)
-- Delivered by Feed43 service
from THE ANOMALIST https://bit.ly/3J5ESUd
No comments:
Post a Comment
Let us know what you think