UFO skeptics won't like this article taking UFOs seriously, written by the former Director of Science and Technology in the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, and appearing in, for goodness' sakes,
Psychology Today. Dr. Eric Haseltine perhaps sensibly restricts his discussion of what's behind the flying rascals to "exciting extensions of known science" versus
Star Trek and possible ET-stuff. At the same time, it's useful to remember today's UFO capabilities don't seem that different from what's been reported for
many years. Some
within government historically have not liked public attention to UFOs, as John Greenewald reports
Yet ANOTHER CIA UFO Document Goes Missing. And John notes the "trend" for such disappearances seems to include the DIA and NSA as well. The more traditional side of science strikes back in two articles by Adam Frank. The first,
If UFOs Are Alien Spaceships, How Did They Get Here?, states the speed of light argument against ETs as fossilized scientific fact. Frank's
The Technology We (Or Aliens) Need For Long-distance Interstellar Travel sketches the "standard" cryosleep and light sail possibilities for human endurance of long-term spaceflight. Then it rather toys with wormholes, warp drives, and quantum mechanics--all based upon current scientific paradigms--which, frankly, astrophysicist Dr. Frank, history shows are subject to change. (WM)
-- Delivered by Feed43 service
from THE ANOMALIST https://bit.ly/3G7bCtn
No comments:
Post a Comment
Let us know what you think