U.S. Finds No Evidence of Alien Technology in Flying Objects, but Can't Rule It Out, Either - The New York Times

Julian E. Barnes and Helene Cooper have tapped into intelligence officials briefed on the upcoming UAPTF report, and relate what their sources are willing to tell under anonymity. It sounds like what many of us were expecting at best from the document. We learn that apparently "they're not ours"; there's concern the Russians and/or Chinese "hypersonic research had far outpaced American military development"; certain of those key "Five Observables" Luis Elizondo has claimed set some cases well beyond next generation capabilities do seem to apply; and that in any event balloons won't cover all of the more than 120 reports in the study. It also appears that the 2004 "Tic Tac" incident is still an "unknown," no matter the confident explanations of certain skeptics. Another piece written by Jennifer Jett asks Why Are We All Talking About U.F.O.s Right Now?. While the first article had some "breaking" news, this piece is a very brief but fairly respectable summary of what led up to the anticipated UAPTF report, with the prediction "It may not say much." CNN is playing "catch up" on this one, but does have its own sources, and the result is US Intelligence Officials Have No Evidence Confirming Navy Pilot UFO Encounters Were Alien Spacecraft. Zachary Cohen and Katie Bo Williams have a few more jabs at what they seem to feel is the "UFO community," but do emphasize the potential security threat inherent in the reports; a perception that "nobody knows what to do about it"; the apparent greater interest Congress is placing in the problem; and that, whether aliens or earthly agencies behind the situation, "Either way it's really bad." (WM)

_{-- Delivered by Feed43 service}

from THE ANOMALIST https://nyti.ms/2ScKztx