There Are Only Two Good Answers for the Upcoming UFO Report, and You're Going to Hate Them Both - Daily Kos

Mark Sumner considers different conclusions from the much-anticipated UAPTF report, depending upon whether or not the UFO videos so far made public accurately show what they appear to depict. Then there's Option 3: "The Answer We're Going To Get." Sumner's argument fails to acknowledge eyewitness and other instrumented data that we're told complements video evidence, but his conclusion may be near the mark. One group already thinks it has the answer, according to Not a Cult: Indonesia's Biggest UFO-Community BETA UFO Weighs in on U.S. Government Report. Wulan Kusuma Wardhani's article may perhaps err in saying the UAPTF report has been issued to Congress, but it's a good indicator of the worldwide interest in that document. Jack Brewer's UFO Disclosure and Transparency: Good for Thee, Not for Me decries what he regards a double standard, as certain advocates for governmental Disclosure and transparency sometimes claim exemption from same requirements when queried about their own exciting assertions. But not losing sight of such claims, Duncan Phenix' Secretary of Defense has Received Briefing on the UAP Task Force's Work has Pentagon spokesperson John F. Kirby admitting that, whatever their origin, the now-familiar aerial incidents "could potentially involve safety and or national security concerns. Absolutely." Kevin Randle makes rather the same point in Condon Committee Negated, after discussing how "the fix was in" against UFO importance early in that University of Colorado UFO Project's history. Kevin then shows how already-leaked UAPTF information contradicts the Condon Report's ruling out alien technology. (WM)

_{-- Delivered by Feed43 service}

from THE ANOMALIST https://bit.ly/3crwWh6