With the date for the release of the government's UFO report imminent, opinion about its thrust runs the gamut. John Gertz details how the stuff reportedly cavorting about in our skies may be robotic probes. Rich Reynolds has long advocated this possibility; Nick Redfern offers specific case support for it while asking
UFOs: Where Are the Crews? CNN says a
Former Obama Counselor Wants to Declassify UFO Intel. John Podesta carefully frames his UFO advocacy as part of his larger crusade for governmental transparency. He also discusses having been "One of QAnon's first targets"; coincidentally UFO-basher Jason Colavito tries to equate UFO advocacy largely with the QAnon mindset in
Why Tucker Carlson Loves UFOs: Jason Colavito on the Hidden Links between Conspiracy Theories. In England there's great anticipation and range of expectations as Alex Mistlin headlines
'It's Going to Come as a Big Shock': UFO Experts Await Pentagon Report. Mistlin covers the topic from the local as well as national level, focusing upon a West Yorkshire market town whose likely most famous resident Alan Godfrey claims his own abduction in 1980. In Billy Cox's
Just a Little Bit Pregnant, Robert Hastings thinks apparent UFO interest in nuclear bases (ours and those of other, including adversary, nations) won't get mentioned in the unclassified version of the upcoming UAPTF report. And Hastings
very much doubts the even more controversial topic of UFO abductions will be broached.
That's partly because the author of
UFOs and Nukes is also a UFO abductee. And Andrew Griffin's
The Independent article
What the US Government Is About to Reveal About The 'Secret Technologies' Being Used In Our Skies sums up the whole UFO/UAP origins confusion with these words "In short...we don't know." (WM)
-- Delivered by Feed43 service
from THE ANOMALIST https://bit.ly/3vNuOXD
No comments:
Post a Comment
Let us know what you think