How Studying UFOs Could Lead to New Scientific Breakthroughs - CU Boulder Today

displays both a knowledge of history and a truly scientific attitude towards the UFO problem in what has consistently been a shouting match between two warring camps. Bonus: a link to a Q&A on the University of Colorado UFO Project with the Lead of the CU Boulder Rare and Distinctive Collections archive. But perhaps Ms. Bowden should consult Chapter 14 of UFOs and Government: A Historical Inquiry, Michael Swords and Robert Powell, eds. for more insight on that Project. Vice's Tim Marchman says Whatever UFOs Are, They Are Absolutely Not Hypersonic Weapons. Marchman justifies his subheading that "Alien technology is a more credible explanation for UFO sightings than the new favorite theory of unnamed defense officials." American Military News' Ryan Morgan has noted Luis Elizondo's repetition of a ufological commonplace, with UFOs Took US Nuclear Systems Offline Repeatedly, Former Pentagon UFO Office Chief Says. The article and embedded video interview with Jacqueline Alemany promote Luis Elizondo's main talking points, similar to some of Marchman's arguments, but add a potential Elizondo run for Congress should the Pentagon continue obfuscating on the subject. Eric Mack also looks towards the upcoming UAPTF document, saying That UFO Report Has Us Thinking All Wrong about the Military. While making a good case for more data acquisition, Mack quotes, and himself offers, mostly skeptical points against the Extraterrestrial hypothesis for UFOs, even throwing in Salvatore Cezar Pais' patent that would enable "intergalactic travel" which at the least would seem to conflict with the leaked conclusion that UFOs "aren't ours." (WM)

_{-- Delivered by Feed43 service}

from THE ANOMALIST https://bit.ly/3vfazSu