'Unidentified Aerial Phenomena,' Better Known as UFOs, Deserve Scientific Investigation - Scientific American

Articles like this, written by scientists of such standing and especially appearing in the mainstream scientific press make one wonder whether a sort of "critical mass" is being gained in making the subject of UFOs a publicly-respectable topic within the academic and technical communities. Ravi Kopparapu and Jacob Haqq-Misra offer a reasoned and timely argument that "UAP are a scientifically interesting problem" and should be studied by interdisciplinary teams of scientists. But Jack Brewer says let's "can" the current uforia. Jack's UFO Debris, Disclosure, and Congressional Investigations basically contends that "We've seen it all before." Greg Eghigian picks up Brewer's recycled history tack in It's Still Not Aliens. Greg notes questions raised about Eric Davis, whose quotes including "off-world vehicles not made on this earth" remain the most sensational in the New York Times article by Ralph Blumenthal and Leslie Kean. And into the melee steps Kevin Randle, who's admittedly questioned Dr. Davis for his apparent belief in a Del Rio UFO crash. Kevin's UAV's and a Little Corroboration for the Latest Story may be "suggestive of some sort of reality behind what Davis has claimed." Perhaps historian Eghigian's conclusion is apt: "So, we'll see. Or maybe not." (WM)

_{-- Delivered by Feed43 service}

from THE ANOMALIST https://bit.ly/311miai