Fox News has a rather belated article on the Navy's apparent recent course correction, borrowed from the 
New York Post's Steven Greenstreet. But it is noteworthy that "mainstream media" is continuing with the story. 
Space.com has itself borrowed from 
The Conversation an article pondering 
Why is the Pentagon Interested in UFOs?. Iain Boyd downplays the almost-incredible flight characteristics displayed by the 2004 "tic tacs," as well, perhaps, as the capabilities of the integrated sensor system the Nimitz Carrier Strike Group possessed at that time. But he does make the hard-to-refute argument that what the Navy seems to be doing is a Good Thing. A Good Thing for publicity, too, as 
History writers Missy Sullivan and Greg Daugherty say 
These 5 UFO Traits, Seen by Navy Fighters, Defy Explanation. These characteristics demonstrate a qualitative "leap" such that experts have to invoke "breakthroughs" in physical technologies to keep vehicles demonstrating such as designed by earthly engineers. The outrageous figures being thrown about for the Nimitz objects' performance are supported by 
That SCU Analysis of the 2004 Tic-Tac [UFO] Encounter, which report remains impressive to Rich Reynolds. Rich's suggestion of a possible "Mother Ship" is, of course, a conjecture based upon human understanding, but it is not unreasonable and is supported to some degree by other UFO sightings. And if someone hasn't looked into this possibility, they should to whatever extent is possible after 15 years. (WM)
-- Delivered by Feed43 service
from THE ANOMALIST https://fxn.ws/2W28jRV
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Let us know what you think