"We will never understand Stonehenge. That is the beauty of the monument." So says one of the co-authors reporting a new discovery in an age-old mystery. This highly-informative article by
The Guardian's Esther Addley challenges one theory, proposes another for how the Stonehenge bluestones were moved, dangles an even more "tantalising possibility" for the bluestones' history, and suggests further explorations. It's must-reading preparation for the Neil Hornsby "Letter"
Heavenly Key to the Stonehenge Mystery. "Heaven on Earth?" Hornsby speculates why bluestones were used at Stonehenge. Some archaeologists are able to tolerate, and even revel in, ambiguity as a creative challenge, a lesson others in that field (and ufology as well) could learn. Then we read that
Erich von Daniken Receives Award for "Integrity," Gives Keynote Speech Based on Decades-Old Mistakes and False Claims. Depending upon whether "just asking questions" or an inability to face facts should be emphasized of the Swiss Ancient Astronaut theorist, Jason Colavito's detailed article, focused upon one "demonstrably false" von Daniken claim, may provoke different reader reactions. Yet another claim for a minor mystery is covered in Josh Jones'
Has the Voynich Manuscript Finally Been Decoded?: Researchers Claim That the Mysterious Text Was Written in Phonetic Old Turkish. Writer Jones quotes one reviewer as saying the theory of a family team of code-crackers "may be one more 'to throw onto the (already Blazing) hearth' of Voynich speculation." (WM)
-- Delivered by Feed43 service
from THE ANOMALIST http://bit.ly/2ExIFZG
No comments:
Post a Comment
Let us know what you think