Rich Reynolds calls for a cease-fire in attention to the Roswell UFO crash story, as retarding progress in a field he regards as seriously goofy anyway. Nick Redfern takes seriously what might at first glance surprise many--the notion that the late Charles Moore might have known more about "bodies" perhaps associated with the 1947 Roswell "crash" than he admitted. Of course, this comports well with Nick's alternative Roswell explanation as possibly an American/Japanese project gone horribly wrong, but he's highlighted an interesting nugget of information--or "rabbit-hole"?--that he thinks could be followed. And speaking of Roswell tangents, Kevin Randle tells us about
Finding the Ruth Barnett Diary. Kevin thinks he's made an argument that squelches Barney Barnett's claim of a crashed saucer on the Plains of San Agustin in July of 1947. Kevin believes he's peeled away another piece of detritus around whatever is the core Roswell story, and to one reader's complaint that we are not getting anywhere, he produces the historical-methods answer about source difficulties. Which to practical non-historians may still seem only "nonsense." (WM)
-- Delivered by Feed43 service
from THE ANOMALIST http://bit.ly/2zSuIGA
No comments:
Post a Comment
Let us know what you think